Case 2300012/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Gold Mount Markets Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300012/2022
- Decision date
- 28 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Amarpreet Arora's claims for redundancy pay and unfair dismissal did not succeed because the tribunal held that he did not have the required 2 years' continuous service, so those claims fell outside its jurisdiction. His claim for outstanding notice pay succeeded: the respondent had given 1 week's notice and paid £122, but the tribunal found a contractual entitlement to 4 weeks' notice after 1 month's service and ordered £653.11 net. His unlawful deduction of wages claim also succeeded for unpaid wages between 1 June 2020 and 10 September 2020, with £3,875.72 net awarded, together with £341.41 for bank charges caused by the non-payment.
Mr Arora also succeeded on statutory holiday pay accrued in the final leave year. The tribunal awarded £1,261 net, calculated as 19.4 days at £65 per day.
Mr Tahir Sadiq succeeded on redundancy pay and unfair dismissal on redundancy grounds. The redundancy award was £600 gross. The unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but the basic award was reduced to nil because of the redundancy payment and the compensatory award was reduced to nil because he would have been dismissed in any event due to the reduction or cessation of the respondent's business. His outstanding notice pay claim succeeded for £1,764 net, his unlawful deduction of wages claim succeeded for £3,780 net with £180 bank charges, and his final leave year holiday pay claim succeeded for £1,135.29 net.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | First claimant. The tribunal held the claim did not succeed because he did not have the required 2 years' continuous service, so it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | First claimant. The tribunal held the claim did not succeed because he did not have the required 2 years' continuous service, so it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | First claimant. Outstanding notice pay succeeded; the respondent gave 1 week's notice and paid £122, but the tribunal found a contractual entitlement to 4 weeks' notice after 1 month's service. | Upheld | — | £653 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant. Wages were not paid between 1 June 2020 and 10 September 2020; the tribunal also awarded bank charges separately. | Upheld | — | £3,876 |
| Holiday pay | First claimant. Statutory holiday pay accrued in the final leave year was awarded at £1,261 net, calculated as 19.4 days at £65 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,261 |
| Redundancy |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,591
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.