Case 2300021/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Clark-Allchurch v Brunswick Healthcare Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300021/2022
- Decision date
- 31 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Clark-Allchurch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was conducted by video at London South Employment Tribunal on 31 August 2022 before Employment Judge Robinson. The claimant, Miss Clark-Allchurch, attended in person. The respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found that the respondent dismissed the claimant by reason of redundancy. On that basis, the claimant’s claim for redundancy pay succeeded. The judgment records that the award was made in accordance with section 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £647.50. No separate findings or additional monetary components are set out in the written judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that the redundancy pay claim succeeded. It awarded £647.50 under section 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £648 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £648
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.