Case 2300023/2024 · Employment Tribunal
MR J JAMIESON v British Airways plc — 2026
- Case reference
- 2300023/2024
- Decision date
- 1 September 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR J JAMIESON
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Taylor found that Mr J Jamieson's claims against British Airways plc for failure to make reasonable adjustments, direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability had not been presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal held that it was not just and equitable to extend time and dismissed claim 2300023/24.
The judgment also states that the claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing that an extension of time was just and equitable, and expressly strikes out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a). These findings concern the time limit, rather than the merits of the discrimination allegations. No monetary remedy is recorded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The claimant's second claim was unaffected and would proceed to a final hearing. The judgment identifies that claim in its operative text as 6005583/25, while the heading lists 2306731/2025 alongside 2300023/2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under Equality Act 2010 sections 20 and 21. The judgment states both that claim 2300023/24 is dismissed as out of time and that it is struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a). The outcome records the express strike-out order; the substantive discrimination allegations were not determined. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination under Equality Act 2010 section 13. The judgment states both that claim 2300023/24 is dismissed as out of time and that it is struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a). The outcome records the express strike-out order; the substantive discrimination allegations were not determined. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under Equality Act 2010 section 15. The judgment states both that claim 2300023/24 is dismissed as out of time and that it is struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a). The outcome records the express strike-out order; the substantive discrimination allegations were not determined. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Just and equitable extension of time
- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a): no reasonable prospect of success
- Equality Act 2010 sections 20 and 21
- Equality Act 2010 section 13
- Equality Act 2010 section 15
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.