Case 2300027/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Drozdowski v British Telecommunications plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300027/2022
- Decision date
- 26 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- London South ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Drozdowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal.
For the Equality Act claims, the Tribunal found that the Claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the time of the alleged discriminatory acts. It also found that there was no contravention of section 19 or section 19A of the Equality Act 2010.
On that basis, the Tribunal dismissed the claims for indirect disability discrimination, indirect disability discrimination by association, indirect sex discrimination, indirect sex discrimination by association, and indirect marriage or civil partnership discrimination. The judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as the Claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the Claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the time of the alleged discriminatory acts, and that the indirect disability discrimination claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment identifies this as indirect disability discrimination by association and dismisses it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment identifies this as indirect sex discrimination and dismisses it. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment identifies this as indirect sex discrimination by association and dismisses it. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The judgment identifies this as indirect marriage or civil partnership discrimination and dismisses it. | Dismissed | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 19 Equality Act 2010
- section 19A Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.