Case 2300033/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Wright v Change Resourcing — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300033/2019
- Decision date
- 1 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to restore it to the Register of Companies. On that basis, the Tribunal considered the case could not proceed against the respondent in its then-current status.
The Tribunal also noted that on 21 February 2023 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
The claim was therefore struck out. No monetary remedy was awarded or assessed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The entire claim was struck out because the respondent company had been dissolved and the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies. The Tribunal also noted that on 21 February 2023 the claimant was given an opportunity to explain in writing why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued, but no acceptable reason was provided. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.