Case 2300044/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Soffe v Group Momentum (Salons) Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300044/2021
- Decision date
- 23 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mrs S Dengate, Mr S Townsend
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs S Soffe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the first respondent as a receptionist from 20 October 2014. After furlough ended on 16 September 2020, the first respondent sent her a lay-off letter and later emails said the salons had been acquired and that employment and contracts would transfer under TUPE. The tribunal did not accept that account and found, on the balance of probabilities, that there had never been a transfer of the claimant's employment to the second respondent.
The tribunal found that the claimant remained employed by the first respondent and was dismissed by that respondent on 31 October 2020 when she received her P45. It held that the first respondent had provided no work or wages after furlough ended, had issued a P45 inconsistent with any TUPE transfer, had followed no dismissal procedure, and had given no potentially fair reason for dismissal. The unfair dismissal claim therefore succeeded against the first respondent, and the TUPE-based claim failed against the second respondent.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was entitled to unpaid wages and pension contributions for the period from 16 September 2020 to 31 October 2020, and to payment for 118.5 hours of accrued untaken holiday. It awarded £1,033.32 holiday pay, £1,255.37 unpaid wages, and £21.69 pension contributions. For unfair dismissal, it awarded a basic award of £1,255.68, compensatory losses totalling £9,157.60 before uplift, and a 25% ACAS uplift of £2,289.40. The total award was £15,013.06, and the tribunal stated that the Recoupment Regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 118.5 hours of untaken annual leave accrued before dismissal. | Upheld | — | £1,033 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | This covered unpaid wages of £1,255.37 and pension contributions of £21.69 for September and October 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,277 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant was dismissed by the first respondent on 31 October 2020 when she received her P45; the tribunal applied a 25% ACAS uplift to the compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £12,703 |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found there had never been a transfer of the claimant's employment to the second respondent within the TUPE Regulations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,013
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,256
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,158
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Part II ERA 1996 s.13
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- ACAS Code of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.