Case 2300045/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Traquinas v Cocktails and Wine Bar (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300045/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Traquinas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South by CVP on 21 January 2022 before Employment Judge Self. The record notes that there was no attendance for either party at the full merits hearing, and the tribunal considered the tribunal file.
Following that review, the tribunal recorded a short judgment stating that all claims were dismissed. No further reasons, findings of fact, or remedy assessment are given in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that all claims were dismissed. This claim type is taken from the case listing context, not from a separately reasoned finding in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states only that all claims were dismissed. This claim type is taken from the case listing context, not from a separately reasoned finding in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that all claims were dismissed. This claim type is taken from the case listing context, not from a separately reasoned finding in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that all claims were dismissed. This claim type is taken from the case listing context, not from a separately reasoned finding in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.