Case 2300062/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Miss I Abromaite (2) Mr A Stavila (3) Mr D Bevzuic v Hextransforma Healthcare Limited (in Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300062/2022
- Decision date
- 4 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 named(1) Miss I Abromaite (2) Mr A Stavila (3) Mr D Bevzuic
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ramsden, sitting at London South on 4 June 2024, considered three linked claims by Miss I Abromaite, Mr A Stavila and Mr D Bevzuic against Hextransforma Healthcare Limited (in administration). The respondent did not attend; the Joint Administrator had consented by letter dated 20 December 2023 to the unlawful deduction of wages and holiday pay claims proceeding for the balance of sums not recoverable from the Redundancy Payments Office.
None of the claimants claimed holiday pay. Each unlawful deduction of wages claim succeeded. Awards comprised the unpaid wages (and, for the First Claimant only, August/September 2021 employee-side pension contributions not paid into the scheme) less the gross sums each claimant had already received from the Redundancy Payments Service.
The respondent was ordered to pay £5,170.33 gross to the First Claimant, £6,137.72 gross to the Second Claimant and £1,851.89 gross to the Third Claimant. Each claimant was directed to account to HMRC for any sums owed.
Claims and outcomes
1 claim adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £13,160 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,160
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.