Case 2300064/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Dunn v Aloto Logistics Ltd Heard via: CVP — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300064/2020
- Decision date
- 13 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Dunn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Dunn was employed by Aloto Logistics Ltd from 29 July 2017 as a Customer Services Supervisor. After an audit while she was on annual leave, she was suspended on full pay on 3 October 2019, attended investigation meetings on 11 and 14 October 2019, and was invited to a disciplinary meeting on 18 October 2019. She resigned on 17 October 2019, later confirming that resignation and the respondent accepting it on 22 October 2019.
The tribunal dismissed the notice pay claim. It held that the words used in the resignation letter, including 'resignation in lieu of notice', meant resignation instead of working notice, not a resignation giving two weeks' notice. The tribunal found the claimant resigned with immediate effect to avoid the disciplinary process and the meeting scheduled for the following day, and that she did not work, or seek to work, a notice period.
On wages, the tribunal accepted that the respondent had changed the payroll cut-off date and that the claimant was paid for 16 working days in the period ending 17 October 2019, so the alleged five-day shortfall in her final pay was not made out. However, it found that the claimant had been paid £2,000 in December 2018 and January 2019, whereas her gross pay was £2,166.66 in November 2018 and from February 2019 to September 2019. That left a shortfall of £166.66 for each of those two months, totalling £333.32, which had not been accounted for and remained outstanding on termination. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay that gross sum, with the claimant to account to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for two weeks' notice pay failed. The tribunal found the claimant resigned with immediate effect on 17/10/2019 and that the phrase 'resignation in lieu of notice' meant resignation instead of working notice, not two weeks' notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a shortfall of £166.66 for each of December 2018 and January 2019, giving an outstanding gross sum of £333.32. It rejected the claimant's assertion that she had been underpaid for five days in the final pay period ending 17/10/2019. | Upheld | — | £333 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £333
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.