Case 2300069/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Ms J Herger v Miller Druck International Stone Limited (In Liquidation) — 2021

Case reference: 2300069/2020
Decision date: 12 March 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Harrington Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms J Herger

Respondent

Miller Druck International Stone Limited (In Liquidation)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Ms J Herger brought a claim arising from the Respondent’s failure to consult appropriate employee representatives on redundancy under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The Tribunal found that the Respondent had failed in that duty, that the number of employees dismissed exceeded 20, and that the dismissals took place without any collective consultation on redundancy.

The Tribunal held that the Claimant’s claim for a protective award was well founded. It awarded 90 days’ pay in respect of the Claimant pursuant to section 189 TULRCA. The extracted judgment does not give a monetary figure for the award, only the period of pay awarded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Protective award under section 189 TULRCA. The judgment records that the Respondent failed to consult appropriate employee representatives on redundancy under section 188 TULRCA, that more than 20 employees were dismissed, and that the dismissals occurred without any collective consultation.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.