Case 2300072/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Garabetova v Blockex Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300072/2019
- Decision date
- 3 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Garabetova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response. Employment Judge Ferguson entered judgment for the claimant, Miss M Garabetova, on the papers. The tribunal made no findings on contested evidence beyond the pleaded and unopposed monetary claims.
The tribunal held that Blockex Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £13,246.12 gross, made up of £12,187.50 in unpaid wages and £1,058.62 in unpaid pension contributions. It also held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,832.16 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £4,593.75 gross. The combined total of the awards is £20,672.03.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded £13,246.12 gross, described as £12,187.50 in unpaid wages plus £1,058.62 in unpaid pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £13,246 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,832.16 in damages. | Upheld | — | £2,832 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awarded £4,593.75 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,594 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,672
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.