Case 2300072/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Collyer v UK Utility Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300072/2021
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Collyer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Morton issued a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had not responded to the claim. The tribunal found that UK Utility Solutions Ltd had not paid the claimant wages of £3,549.26 and notice pay of £546.04, and it ordered those sums to be paid forthwith.
The tribunal also awarded £382.23 for 3.5 days of holiday outstanding on termination, recording that this was holiday pay due under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The total amount due was £4,477.53.
The claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed because he did not have the necessary qualifying service to bring that claim. The judgment recorded no basic award, compensatory award, interest, or injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded unpaid wages of £3,549.26 and notice pay of £546.04. | Upheld | — | £4,095 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay for 3.5 days outstanding on termination, described as being in breach of regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £382 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have the necessary qualifying service to bring an unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,478
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.