Case 2300081/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ijaola v TOK Construction Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300081/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ijaola
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South on 17 January 2020 before Employment Judge Khalil sitting alone. Neither party attended the hearing, and neither side communicated any explanation for the non-attendance. The tribunal checked that the notice of hearing had been sent to both parties at their correct addresses and made enquiries about the absence.
In those circumstances, the tribunal dismissed the claim pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Regulations 2013. The judgment does not contain separate factual findings on the underlying race discrimination or unlawful deduction from wages allegations, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claim pursuant to rule 47 after neither party attended. It does not set out separate findings on the underlying race discrimination allegation. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim pursuant to rule 47 after neither party attended. It does not set out separate findings on the underlying wages allegation. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunals Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.