Case 2300083/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D. Wilson v Motorline Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300083/2020
- Decision date
- 17 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith Date
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D. Wilson
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records a hearing on 17 September 2021 at London South via CVP before Employment Judge T.R. Smith, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Knill (solicitor). The judgment states that the second respondent, Mr M Phelps, was dismissed as a respondent from the proceedings.
The written record also states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No substantive findings on the underlying whistleblowing or unfair dismissal claims, and no remedy figures, are set out in the written text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment states that the second respondent, Mr M Phelps, was dismissed as a respondent from the proceedings. No substantive claim outcome is recorded in the text provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.