Case 2300098/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Elmi v Harshil and Nishant Modasia “trading as En Root Limited” — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300098/2022
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott KC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Elmi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr O Elmi brought a holiday pay claim against Harshil and Nishant Modasia trading as En Root Limited. He did not attend the hearing and provided no documentation to support the claim. The respondent attended the hearing, produced documents, and had Mr N Modasia available to give evidence as the company accountant.
Employment Judge Truscott KC found that the claimant had not established that any holiday pay was due. The judgment states that the claim was therefore dismissed because there were no sums due to the claimant. The respondent was content not to proceed with its counterclaim.
The judgment also records that the claimant made a separate claim in relation to a share certificate, but that claim was not within the jurisdiction of the Employment Tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had not established that any holiday pay was due. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | A separate claim relating to a share certificate was recorded, but the judgment says it was not within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.