Case 2300099/2019 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mr N Smith 2. Mrs S Rayner v Tollgate Taverns Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300099/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge HYDE Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mr N Smith 2. Mrs S Rayner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Hyde found that Tollgate Taverns Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from wages owed to Mr N Smith and Mrs S Rayner. For Mr Smith, the tribunal recorded unpaid wages of £998.69 gross and accrued but untaken holiday outstanding at termination of £1,822.06 gross, and ordered repayment of £2,820.75 gross forthwith.
For Mrs Rayner, the tribunal recorded unpaid wages of £298.31 gross and accrued but untaken holiday outstanding at termination of £544.25 gross, and ordered repayment of £842.56 gross forthwith. The wording of paragraph 4 refers to repayment to the 'First Claimant', but the surrounding text indicates that this was intended to be the Second Claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First Claimant. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages comprising £998.69 gross in unpaid wages and £1,822.06 gross for accrued but untaken holiday outstanding at termination. | Upheld | — | £2,821 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second Claimant. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages comprising £298.31 gross in unpaid wages and £544.25 gross for accrued but untaken holiday outstanding at termination. Paragraph 4 of the judgment says 'First Claimant', but the context shows this award was for the Second Claimant. | Upheld | — | £843 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,663
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.