Case 2300103/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Wardega v Apex Cycles Ltd, Michael Cameron — 2025
- Case reference
- 2300103/2025
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Wardega
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented the claim in the London South Employment Tribunal on 9 January 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge proceeded to determine the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Mr H Wardega was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. It recorded that he had worked for the respondent for 18 years, was aged 51 on the date he was made redundant, and had a weekly pay of £644.23, which entitled him to 1.5 weeks' redundancy pay for each year worked. The tribunal awarded £14,817.29 in total and cancelled the hearing listed for 15 May 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22. | Upheld | — | £14,817 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,817
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.