Case 2300117/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300117/2020
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Balogun sat at London South on 23 July 2020 in the case of Mr AA Adle v Abellio London Limited. The judgment records that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Cook, Counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims. It also dismissed the holiday pay claim and the bonus pay claim. The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying facts or any separate reasoning beyond the dismissal order.
The record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or by written request within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to this as a bonus pay claim; the extracted text does not identify a separate statutory or contractual label for it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.