Case 2300121/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Miss I Ferber - Counsel — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300121/2018
- Decision date
- 29 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
- Panel members
- Mr S Huggins, Mr S Sheath
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Kyriakos Eremionkhale brought claims against Network Rail Infrastructure Limited for age discrimination, race discrimination, and unfair dismissal. The case was heard at London South on 21 and 22 April 2022 and 25 to 29 April 2022 before Employment Judge K Andrews, with members Mr S Huggins and Mr S Sheath. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Miss I Ferber, Counsel.
The Tribunal's unanimous decision was that all the claims failed and were dismissed. The judgment also records a costs order requiring the Claimant to pay the Respondent £1,500. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.