Case 2300125/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Racz v Kasko Parts Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300125/2023
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Racz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 9 January 2023 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Wright Date therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the tribunal could properly determine the claim on that basis without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £8,117.25 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £546.25 gross damages for that claim. In addition, the respondent was found to have failed to pay holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £1,484.37 net.
The tribunal further found that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars pursuant to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant's claim under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 succeeded, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay minimum damages equivalent to two weeks' pay in the sum of £1,092.50 gross. The total awarded was £11,240.37, and the hearing listed for 27 June 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from wages and was ordered to pay £8,117.25 gross. | Upheld | — | £8,117 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and was awarded £546.25 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £546 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £1,484.37 net. | Upheld | — | £1,484 |
| Other | The claimant succeeded under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars; minimum damages of two weeks' pay were awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,093 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,240
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.