Case 2300129/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Tillmanns v Flavoil Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300129/2022
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rea Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Tillmanns
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunals on 13 January 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages for the months of June, July and August 2021. The deductions were recorded as £3,130.00, and the judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £9,390.00 net.
The judgment records a total sum payable of £9,390.00. The hearing listed for 14 September 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for June, July and August 2021 totalling £3,130.00 and ordered payment of £9,390.00 net. | Upheld | — | £9,390 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,390
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.