Case 2300144/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Hill v Trustees, Officers, Committee and Members for the time being in force at Whitstable Labour Club (Unincorporated Association) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300144/2018
- Decision date
- 11 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Panel members
- Mrs R Downer, Mr D Newlyn
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting at London South, Ashford on 7, 10 and 11 February 2020 before Employment Judge Tsamados with Mrs R Downer and Mr D Newlyn as the lay members, heard Mrs V Hill's complaint against the Trustees, Officers, Committee and Members for the time being in force at Whitstable Labour Club (unincorporated association). The only claim identified in the written judgment was unlawful sex discrimination.
The tribunal unanimously found that the Claimant was not subjected to unlawful sex discrimination. The claim was therefore dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time by a party.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.