Case 2300144/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Lambert v Cambridge House & Talbot — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300144/2020
- Decision date
- 11 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Members
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr J Hutchings, Mr P Adkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Lambert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at London South, sitting on 5 to 9 April 2022 before Employment Judge Tsamados with lay members Mr J Hutchings and Mr P Adkins, heard the Claimant in person and the Respondent represented by counsel. The judgment records that the tribunal was unanimous.
The tribunal held that the Claimant’s complaints of automatic unfair dismissal and detrimental treatment because he said he had made protected disclosures were not well founded. It also held that his claim for damages for breach of contract was not well founded, and that his direct race discrimination claim was not well founded.
The judgment therefore dismissed the Claimant’s case in full. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The complaint covered automatic unfair dismissal and detrimental treatment because the Claimant said he made protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Claimant sought damages for breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The Claimant alleged direct race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.