Case 2300145/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Marden v Town and Country Cleaners Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300145/2020
- Decision date
- 3 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Marden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 2 June 2020, the Tribunal gave Mrs K Marden an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not actively been pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Martin Dated struck out the claim. The reasons do not address the underlying merits of the pleaded complaints, and no substantive liability findings or remedy assessment are recorded.
The hearing fixed for 17 July 2020 was vacated as a result of the strike out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify this claim separately, but the case listing for this matter identifies breach of contract as one of the pleaded categories. The judgment struck out the claim for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify this claim separately, but the case listing for this matter identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the pleaded categories. The judgment struck out the claim for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.