Case 2300154/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Terri-Lea Gilbert v TNK Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300154/2020
- Decision date
- 21 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Terri-Lea Gilbert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Khalil, sitting alone, found that Ms Terri-Lea Gilbert’s claim for unfair dismissal was well founded and that she had been unfairly dismissed. The judgment records that the respondent did not attend the hearing. The tribunal awarded a compensatory award of £5,189.17 gross, stating that it had no net pay figures and so assessed loss gross for the period from 1 October 2019 to the hearing date, with that sum including a further 12 weeks of future loss of £644.40. The tribunal also noted that the claimant was not in receipt of any social security benefits.
The tribunal made a separate basic award of £630. It also awarded £630, described as two weeks’ pay, under s.38 Employment Act 2002 because the respondent had failed, when the proceedings were begun, to provide a written statement of employment particulars or an up to date statement. No injury to feelings award or interest award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded and awarded a compensatory award of £5,189.17 gross, plus a basic award of £630. | Upheld | — | £5,189 |
| Other | Award made under s.38 Employment Act 2002 because the respondent failed to provide, when proceedings were begun, a written statement of employment particulars or an up to date statement. | Upheld | — | £630 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,449
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £630
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,189
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.