Case 2300155/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L A Taylor v Mr L Brazil — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300155/2023
- Decision date
- 5 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A. Beale Claimant
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L A Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal by CVP on 4 July 2023 before Employment Judge A. Beale. The Claimant, Mrs L A Taylor, appeared in person and the Respondent, Mr L Brazil, also appeared in person.
The judgment records that the Claimant's claims for breach of contract and/or unauthorised deductions from wages were dismissed because they had been brought out of time. The tribunal therefore held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the claims.
Written reasons were not provided in the judgment record because reasons had been given orally at the hearing, subject to any request for written reasons within 14 days of the sending of the decision. The judgment was sent to the parties and entered in the register on 5 July 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the claim was brought out of time, so the Employment Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claim was brought out of time, so the Employment Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.