Case 2300165/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Theba and Mr E Reffas v Contract Security Services Ltd (In Creditor’s Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300165/2022
- Decision date
- 17 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Theba and Mr E Reffas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in claims brought by Mr S Theba and Mr E Reffas against Contract Security Services Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation). The tribunal record identifies the matter as Employment Tribunal case numbers 2300165/2022 and 2300166/2022, heard on 17 June 2022 at London South by CVP, with no attendance from either side.
The only substantive determination recorded is that the Claimants' application for a Protective Award was not well-founded. The tribunal therefore dismissed the application. No further findings of fact, liability analysis, or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Because the judgment records only dismissal of the Protective Award application and does not set out any monetary award, no remedy sum is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment states that the Claimants' application for a Protective Award was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.