Case 2300166/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Ward v The Spring Trust Partnership — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300166/2019
- Decision date
- 7 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Ward brought a claim against The Spring Trust Partnership at London South Tribunals. The tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Freer on 24 January 2019, held that the Claimant’s claim of unfair constructive dismissal was unsuccessful.
The written judgment does not set out the tribunal’s reasons in text form. It records that the reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
No remedy was recorded in the judgment, and no monetary award is stated. The judgment therefore records a dismissal of the constructive dismissal claim only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal stated that the Claimant’s claim of unfair constructive dismissal was unsuccessful. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided on a written request within 14 days. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.