Case 2300170/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Fitzpatrick v Richmond Housing Partnership — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300170/2018
- Decision date
- 12 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash Representation
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Fitzpatrick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Mr S Fitzpatrick's complaint of unfair dismissal. The written judgment records that the claim was presented outside the statutory time limit and that it had been reasonably practicable to present the claim before the time limit expired.
No substantive findings on the merits of the dismissal are set out in the written record. The decision is determined on limitation grounds only, and the judgment therefore does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claim was presented outside the statutory time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to present it before the limit expired. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable to present the claim before the time limit expired
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.