Case 2300185/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Clark and 25 Others v Arjowiggins Chartham Mill Limited (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300185/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Clark and 25 Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the first respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It held the complaint well founded in respect of the 26 claimants, who were employees at the respondent's Station Road, Canterbury premises and who were dismissed as redundant on various dates between 22 September 2022 and 16 December 2022.
The tribunal made a protective award and ordered the first respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period of 90 days beginning on the date of each dismissal, as set out in the schedule of claimants. The extracted text does not state a single total monetary figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal made a protective award for a protected period of 90 days beginning on each dismissal date; no single monetary figure is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.