in person For the v Osteohealth Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 2300195/2020
Decision date: 2 December 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Richardson Signed

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

in person For the

Respondent

Osteohealth Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a preliminary hearing at Croydon on 1 December 2020, Employment Judge A Richardson found that Mr R Milne was, at the material time, an employee of Osteohealth Limited. The respondent did not appear at the hearing.

The tribunal held that the claimant's claim under section 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £1,878.75. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would follow unless requested within 14 days.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Working time regulations	Claim under section 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 found well founded. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant was, at the material time, an employee of the respondent.	Upheld	—	£1,879

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,879; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.