Case 2300203/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Harris v Red Sun Road Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300203/2022
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the unfair dismissal part of Mr J Harris's claim against Red Sun Road Ltd. By letter dated 14 February 2022, it gave him an opportunity to make representations as to why that part of the claim should not be struck out because of the apparent lack of two years' continuous service.
Mr Harris did not make any written representations in response. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal part of the claim under rule 37.
The judgment states that there would still be a hearing to determine the other parts of the claim, but those claims are not identified in the extracted text and no further substantive findings or remedy were recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal part of the claim under rule 37 after giving the claimant an opportunity to explain why it should not be struck out because of the apparent lack of two years' continuous service. The claimant did not make written representations. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.