Case 2300209/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs W Stokes v David Green & Co — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300209/2022
- Decision date
- 12 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs W Stokes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 20 January 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Wright decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 10 October 2022 was cancelled.
On the papers, the tribunal found that Mrs W Stokes had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded her £1,680 gross in damages. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,200 gross. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement, and £210 gross was awarded for that sum.
The tribunal recorded a total award of £6,090 gross. It also stated that the claimant was responsible for any figures owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for notice pay, stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £4,200 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £210 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,090
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.