Case 2300211/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Patel v Mr D Tyer — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300211/2020
- Decision date
- 18 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Patel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing heard by telephone on 18 November 2020 before Employment Judge Kelly sitting alone. The claimant, Mr N Patel, did not attend. The tribunal noted that he had been reminded about the hearing on 15 October 2020 and again on 17 November 2020, and that calls were made to both of his numbers at 11.00, 11.15 and after 11.30 without answer.
The tribunal considered whether to dismiss the claim, proceed in the claimant's absence, or adjourn the hearing, mindful of rule 47. It found that the claimant had acted unreasonably in failing to attend, particularly given his representative's information that he would attend and was briefed to do so.
Applying the overriding objective of dealing with cases proportionately and avoiding delay and expense, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims on non-attendance. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on the underlying race discrimination, religion or belief discrimination, unfair dismissal, or unlawful deduction from wages claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed on the claimant's non-attendance at the preliminary hearing; the judgment contains no merits determination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed on the claimant's non-attendance at the preliminary hearing; the judgment contains no merits determination. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on the claimant's non-attendance at the preliminary hearing; the judgment contains no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed on the claimant's non-attendance at the preliminary hearing; the judgment contains no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.