Case 2300213/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Carol McCormack v Gold Care Management Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300213/2023
- Decision date
- 10 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms Cook, Ms Harthill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Carol McCormack
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal on 3 to 6 September 2024 before Employment Judge Dyal sitting with Ms Cook and Ms Harthill. The claimant was Ms Carol McCormack and the respondent was Gold Care Management Services Limited.
The judgment records a single operative outcome: 'The claims fail and are dismissed.' No separate reasoning, liability findings, or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted text provided.
On the basis of the tribunal's final order, the claims recorded for this case were dismissed and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category 'Public Interest Disclosure'; the judgment itself states only that the claims fail and are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself states only that the claims fail and are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.