Case 2300229/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Williams v Citrus FM Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300229/2021
- Decision date
- 12 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered a single complaint of unfair dismissal brought by Miss B Williams against Citrus FM. By letter dated 12 March 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out because she had not been employed for two years, which the tribunal identified as the qualifying period under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The claimant did not make written representations. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37. No monetary remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant was not employed for two years as required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and she did not make written representations in response to the tribunal's 12 March 2021 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.