Case 2300233/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P O’Neill v Veolia Energy UK Limited & Veolia CHP UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300233/2019
- Decision date
- 13 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P O’Neill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt hearings in Manchester on 6 December 2019 and 5 February 2020 before Employment Judge Leach, the tribunal recorded agreed payments to Mr P O'Neill. The respondents and each of them were ordered to pay £219.45 gross as an unlawful deduction from wages contrary to s13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and £104.95 as damages for breach of contract for reimbursement of expenses.
The judgment did not set out separate liability findings on those two claims and stated that the sums had been agreed between the parties. It further stated that all other claims in the proceedings were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of those claims. The attached notice explained the tribunal's standard interest regime for unpaid awards under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross amount agreed between the parties; payable to the claimant less tax and national insurance deductions. | Settled | — | £219 |
| Breach of contract | Damages agreed between the parties for reimbursement of expenses. | Settled | — | £105 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £324
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.