Case 2300236/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Ghada Al-Naimi v Buildmaster Construction Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300236/2023
- Decision date
- 7 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Ghada Al-Naimi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Ghada Al-Naimi brought a claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unauthorised deductions from wages for the period June 2022 to May 2023. The tribunal found that she had been employed by Buildmaster Construction Services Ltd as a company secretary, that she was paid monthly in arrears, and that her properly payable gross salary for the period in question was £2,400 per month.
The tribunal found that the claimant in fact received £1,400 gross each month during that period, leaving a shortfall of £1,000 per month and a total shortfall of £12,000. It found there was no written agreement or written variation authorising the reduction in salary, and no contemporaneous documentary evidence supporting the respondent's case that part of the role had become redundant, that she was not entitled to wages because she had done no work, or that she had been dismissed and re-employed on new terms.
The tribunal rejected the respondent's reliance on an alleged verbal variation and on gross misconduct as ending the employment, noting that the respondent continued to pay the claimant at the reduced rate and that there was no documentary support for the asserted change in contractual position. It held that the reduction in pay was not authorised for the purposes of section 13 ERA 1996 and amounted to a series of unauthorised deductions within section 23 ERA 1996. The claimant was awarded £12,000 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £12,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 23 ERA 1996
- series of deductions under section 23(3) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.