Case 2300246/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. James Bromige, counsel. For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300246/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mason Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr. James Bromige, counsel. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the case, heard by telephone on 28 July 2020 before Employment Judge Mason, concerned Mrs Khan v Air Partners Plc. The tribunal noted that the Claimant was represented by Mr James Bromige and the Respondent by Mr Jonathan Heard.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on liability. It states that the Claimant's claims of pregnancy and maternity discrimination and redundancy payment were dismissed on withdrawal. No reasons are given for the withdrawal, and no contested legal analysis or factual findings are set out in the text provided.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment is a short disposal following withdrawal of the claims, dated 29 July 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the Claimant's pregnancy and maternity discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the Claimant's redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.