Case 2300247/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Vethanayagam v Quo Vadis Trust — 2018
- Case reference
- 2300247/2018
- Decision date
- 31 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Vethanayagam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing heard at Ashford on 31 August 2018, Employment Judge Pritchard considered the respondent's application that the claimant's holiday pay and notice claims should be struck out and/or made subject to a deposit order. The tribunal refused that application.
The record states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the preliminary hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the record of the decision. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability for either the holiday pay claim or the notice claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | At the preliminary hearing on 31 August 2018, the tribunal refused the respondent's application that this claim be struck out and/or that a deposit order be made. The judgment does not determine the merits of the holiday pay claim. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | At the preliminary hearing on 31 August 2018, the tribunal refused the respondent's application that this claim be struck out and/or that a deposit order be made. The judgment does not determine the merits of the notice claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.