Case 2300250/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Inessa Avagyan v Iknowa Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300250/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Inessa Avagyan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Abbott, sitting alone at London South on 27 September 2022, found that Iknowa Limited had made unlawful deductions from Ms Inessa Avagyan's wages. The tribunal found that the respondent did not pay all wages due on 30 November 2021 and 31 December 2021, although the amounts due were later paid.
The judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay the net sum of £1,395.57 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. It also ordered payment of £100.00 for financial loss attributable to the unlawful deduction from wages due on 31 December 2021, pursuant to section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made unlawful deductions from wages by not paying all wages due on 30 November 2021 and 31 December 2021. The unpaid amounts were later paid, but the tribunal still ordered payment of the net sum of £1,395.57 plus £100.00 for financial loss attributable to the deduction due on 31 December 2021 under section 24(2) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,496 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,496
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.