Case 2300252/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Juniper v Stripe 21 Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300252/2019
- Decision date
- 14 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Juniper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Ferguson recorded that the claimant, Mr J Juniper, succeeded in his complaints of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, age discrimination, victimisation, detriments on grounds of protected disclosure, and unauthorised deductions from wages against Stripe 21 Limited. The judgment does not set out the factual or legal reasoning for those findings in the extracted text provided.
The judgment records that the preliminary hearing listed for 10:00am on 15 August 2019 was converted into a remedy hearing with a time estimate of three hours. It states that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at that hearing. No monetary award is set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Succeeded in this Rule 21 judgment; remedy to be determined at the hearing listed for 15 August 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Succeeded in this Rule 21 judgment; remedy to be determined at the hearing listed for 15 August 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Age discrimination complaint succeeded in this Rule 21 judgment; remedy to be determined at the hearing listed for 15 August 2019. | Upheld | Age | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation complaint succeeded in this Rule 21 judgment; remedy to be determined at the hearing listed for 15 August 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriments on grounds of protected disclosure succeeded; remedy to be determined at the hearing listed for 15 August 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded; remedy to be determined at the hearing listed for 15 August 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.