Case 2300261/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr WA Stolten v Tiger Transport Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300261/2018
- Decision date
- 30 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr WA Stolten
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21. The tribunal found that Tiger Transport Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr WA Stolten's wages and ordered repayment of £680.50. The decision does not set out further reasoning beyond the dispositive finding on the wages claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £700.00 for that breach. No other claims, legal tests, or factual disputes are recorded in the extracted text.
The bottom-line financial consequence recorded in the judgment is £1,380.50 in total, made up of the two separate awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £681 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £700.00. | Upheld | — | £700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,381
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.