Case 2300265/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Bapodara v Travelodge Hotels Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300265/2022
- Decision date
- 12 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Bapodara
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. It had previously written to the claimant on 8 April 2022 giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why that complaint should not be struck out.
The stated reason was that the unfair dismissal complaint had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant had not yet resigned from employment with the respondent when she submitted her ET1. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining complaints were still listed for a preliminary hearing on case management on 8 February 2023 and a five-day full hearing from 22 March 2024. Those remaining complaints were not determined in this strike out judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the Tribunal considered it had no reasonable prospect of success, as the claimant had not yet resigned when she submitted her ET1. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.