Case 2300266/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300266/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hildebrand Dated
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a single-issue unfair dismissal case heard by Employment Judge P Hildebrand sitting alone at Ashford on 21 November 2019. The respondent’s name was amended to Speedy Asset Services Limited in the judgment record.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. The extract does not include the tribunal’s substantive reasoning, because it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
No monetary remedy was awarded in the written record supplied, and no split of compensation or other award is recorded. On the face of the judgment extract, the final outcome was dismissal of the claim only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons are provided in the extract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.