Case 2300270/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Rodriguez v Onsite Property Management Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300270/2022
- Decision date
- 6 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Rodriguez
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 25 January 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 to determine the claim on the papers.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,192.35 gross. It also upheld the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £453.22.
A further claim for unpaid contractual expenses succeeded, with an order for £132.11 gross. The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,244.
The total amount payable was £5,021.68. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any amounts owed to HMRC in respect of tax and national insurance contributions, and that the hearing listed for 11 October 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £2,192.35 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,192 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £453.22. | Upheld | — | £453 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay contractual expenses and ordered £132.11 gross. | Upheld | — | £132 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,244 damages. | Upheld | — | £2,244 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,022
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.