Case 2300274/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Ezziane v Glasshouse (BexleyHeath) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300274/2023
- Decision date
- 8 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Ezziane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to Glasshouse (BexleyHeath) Limited and found that Mr H Ezziane was an employee of the respondent within section 230(1) ERA 1996. The hearing was by CVP, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent.
The unpaid holiday pay claim was dismissed. The tribunal found that the claim had not been brought within the relevant statutory time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been brought within that time, so the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim.
On the remaining substantive issue, the tribunal declared that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy within section 139(1)(a)(i) and/or (ii) ERA 1996. It ordered payment of a statutory redundancy payment of £787.50.
The tribunal also made an additional award of £350, described as two weeks' pay, because when the proceedings began the respondent was in breach of its obligation to provide a written statement of particulars. The total sum payable under the judgment was £1,137.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed because it was not brought within the relevant statutory time limit when it was reasonably practicable for it to have been brought within that time limit, so the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal declared that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy within section 139(1)(a)(i) and/or (ii) ERA 1996 and ordered payment of a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £788 |
| Other | The tribunal made a further award of two weeks' pay because, when the proceedings were begun, the respondent was in breach of its obligation to provide a written statement of particulars. | Upheld | — | £350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,138
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.230(1) ERA 1996
- s.139(1)(a)(i) and/or (ii) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.