Case 2300286/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Vieira de Azevedo v Lumeon Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300286/2019
- Decision date
- 15 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Vieira de Azevedo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr F Vieira de Azevedo was employed by Lumeon Limited from 26 January 2016 and his employment ended on 9 October 2018. He entered ACAS early conciliation on 21 November 2018, the certificate issued on 5 December 2018, and he presented his ET1 on 23 January 2019. The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim should have been received on 22 January 2019 and was therefore one day late.
Applying s.111 ERA 1996, the tribunal held that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the unfair dismissal claim within time. It noted that he had been aware for months that he might bring proceedings, had legal advice from a solicitor, and had already completed the internal process by 6 November 2018. The explanations advanced for the delay, including stress, family responsibilities, and needing to find another job, were not enough to justify an extension.
For the Equality Act claim, the claimant relied on an incident on 16 March 2018 with Alex Cooper which he described as bullying and harassment on the protected characteristic of race, and on criticism of his English language ability. The tribunal held that those matters were outside the three-month time limit, even if treated as an ongoing act ending with dismissal, and declined to extend time on the just and equitable basis under s.123 Equality Act 2010. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims. The tribunal also said it did not at that stage accept that a protected disclosure claim had been presented, but that the time-point reasoning would apply to such a claim if it had been raised.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the unfair dismissal claim was presented one day out of time. It found the ET1 should have been received on 22 January 2019 but was presented on 23 January 2019, and concluded it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have brought the claim within the primary time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The claimant referred to an incident on 16 March 2018 with Alex Cooper which he said amounted to bullying and harassment on the protected characteristic of race, together with earlier criticism of his English language ability. The tribunal held those matters were out of time and refused to extend time as just and equitable. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.111 ERA 1996
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser EAT 0165/07
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.