Case 2300295/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Green v Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300295/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
- Venue
- London South via CVP
- Panel members
- Mrs S Macdonald, Mr J Turley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal sat as a panel and gave a unanimous judgment on a preliminary issue. It found that the claimant was not a disabled person by reason of depression under s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material date.
The written record states that reasons were given at the time, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within 14 days. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in this judgment, and the judgment does not determine the other listed claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records only a preliminary issue: the claimant was not a disabled person by reason of depression under s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material date. It does not adjudicate the sex discrimination or unfair dismissal claims listed elsewhere. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.