Case 2300297/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E M Matos Beltre v Purple Ball Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300297/2022
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E M Matos Beltre
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that Purple Ball Ltd had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have the company restored to the Register of Companies.
The tribunal also noted that on 16 March 2023 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
On that basis, Employment Judge Taylor ordered that the claim be struck out on 30 October 2023. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive legal basis of the claim; it only states that the claim was struck out because the respondent had been dissolved, the claimant had not applied to restore it to the Register of Companies, and the claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons after being given an opportunity to do so on 16 March 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.